Figure 1: by Author
Ever notice how Tesla’s
are all over the news, but not on the road? Most cars around you still run on
gas. So, if EVs are the future, why aren't they everywhere yet?
Despite this push
for cleaner transportation and the fight against climate change, gas stations
are still as busy as ever. Sure, EVs offer real benefits, but it’s not just
about the environmental aspects.
The transition has
begun, no doubt. But why is it taking so long?
The Upside of EVs: Positive Externalities
In the automotive
industry, EVs offer a cleaner, more sustainable alternative to traditional
gas-powered cars. They don't just benefit individual drivers, but they also
create positive effects for society, which is defined as positive
externalities.
One major win?
Cleaner air. Unlike internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles—like regular cars
which use diesel oil or gasoline—BEVs produce zero emissions like CO or
nitrogen oxides. This reduction in pollution doesn’t only provide better air
quality for us, also, it reduces the effects of global warming.
And when we think
about air pollution, what comes to mind? Health problems, exactly. According to
the NHS, low air quality is the biggest environmental risk to public health in
the UK. It's linked to shorter life expectancy, and rising medical costs by being
the main reason for some of the serious chronic diseases. (Public Health
England, 2018) By popularizing EVs, we can prevent these health issues caused
by pollution.
You can´t talk
about the benefits of EVs without mentioning renewable energy. According to
research made by Stanford (Kuo, 2019), we will run out of fossil fuels
–completely- before the end of the 21st century. That means we can no longer
rely on them. Switching to EVs helps
drive investment in renewables and supports the shift toward a cleaner, more
reliable energy future.
Figure 2 (Public Health England, 2018)
Barriers to EV adoption: Behavioral biases and
Asymmetric Information
Well,
you’re probably wondering why more of us haven’t made the switch to EVs yet.
Unfortunately, there’s no straightforward answer. The truth is psychological
biases can cloud consumer judgement. One is that people love instant rewards.
It's called hyperbolic discounting, where we place more importance on the
present than the near future.
Even
though EVs save money in the long run, the hefty upfront price is a dealbreaker
for most. Add in the stress about where and how long the charge will last,
suddenly the switch doesn’t feel so simple (Arnold, 2024). It's a classic case
of present bias: short-term concerns feel more urgent than future savings.
To
make things harder, many people just don't want to leave their comfort zone.
Your current car? That's your reference point, familiar, reliable, and part of
your routine. Switching to an EV feels like giving that up, and suddenly the
change feels like a loss, even if it pays off later (Kim et al., 2020).
Economics call this loss aversion; we
feel the pain of losing something more than the joy of gaining something new.
So even when the future looks better with an EV, that short-term discomfort
holds people back.
Sometimes,
it’s not just mindset, it’s the lack of clear information. With EVs, there’s
often a gap between what sellers know and what buyers understand. Economists call this asymmetric information. Many people are skeptical because they
don't have all the facts, like where to charge, how long it takes, or how far
the car can go (Kim et al., 2020).
To
address these barriers, governments are intervening by implementing measures to
make EVs cheaper for consumers. Additionally, EV companies are reassuring
buyers, highlighting the quality and features that aren't immediately obvious.
Economists call this market signalling.
When
it comes to signalling, Tesla leads the charge (pun intended). Known for its
innovation, sleek design, and focus on sustainability, Tesla uses media buzz
and its Supercharger network to send a clear message: “We’ve got you covered.”
And it's working, a Canadian survey found that 50% of people familiar with the
brand said it increased their interest in EVs (Miller, 2019).
At
this point, you’re probably thinking: If all these issues are being addressed,
what’s the problem?
The Hidden Costs: Negative Externalities
It's
easy to picture a cleaner, greener future with EVs, and in many ways, they
deliver. But there's a side that doesn't show up in shiny ads or sustainability
reports.
Let's
start with batteries. EVs rely on materials like lithium, cobalt and nickel,
minerals that often come from developing countries, which usually means low
wages, poor working conditions, and even child labour. On top of that, mining
causes significant environmental damage. So, while EVs create positive
externalities, they also generate hidden costs: negative externalities, not
reflected in the car’s price but still paid by others.
And
when those batteries reach the end of their life? Most aren't recycled properly
and end up in landfills, creating long-term ecological harm.
Weight
is another issue. EVs are much heavier than petrol cars, which leads to faster
road wear and tire deterioration. And those worn tires? They shed microplastics
into the air and water, polluting our health and the oceans (Kole et al.,
2017).
Building
a clean future is not just buying EVs. We need the infrastructure to support
them, more charging stations, stronger power grids, and major investment. While
this sounds great on paper, in practice, it puts pressure on public budgets and
land use.
And
here's a twist you might not expect: EVs could increase emissions. Since
they're cheaper to run, people may drive more (Yang et al.,
2017). This is known as the rebound effect or Jevons Paradox. So instead of reducing emissions, we are cancelling out the gains with
increased traffic, energy demand, and if the grid is powered by fossil fuels,
even more pollution.
Figure 3: Lifecycle Analysis of UK Road Vehicles (Nikolas Hill,
2021)
EVs
are an important step towards climate change, but they aren't perfect, as
costs, which is important to address and not just promote the hype… But will
EV’s ever take over?
References:
Arnold, C. (2024). Power Shift: New Study Shows Over Half of Consumers Worry About EV Range. [online] StoryStream. Available at: https://storystream.ai/resources/blog/power-shift-ev-motivators-concerns/ [Accessed 3 Apr. 2025].
Haghani, M., Ghaderi, H. and Hensher, D. (2024). Hidden effects and externalities of electric vehicles. Energy Policy, 194, pp.114335–114335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114335.
Kim, J., Seung, H., Lee, J. and Ahn, J. (2020). Asymmetric preference and loss aversion for electric vehicles: The reference-dependent choice model capturing different preference directions. Energy Economics, 86, p.104666. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104666.
Miller, I. (2019). Has Tesla influenced consumer perceptions of electric vehicles? Insights from a survey of Canadian car buyers Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Resource Management in the School of Resource and Environmental Management Faculty of Environment. [online] Available at: https://sustainabletransport.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/ingermiller-699.pdf [Accessed 3 Apr. 2025].
Public Health England (2018). Health matters: Air Pollution. [online] GOV.UK. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-matters-air-pollution/health-matters-air-pollution.
R B, L. (2023). The Environmental Impact of Battery Production for Electrical Vehicles. [online] Earth.org. Available at: https://earth.org/environmental-impact-of-battery-production/.
Reference listKuo,
G. (2019). When fossil fuels run out, What then? [online] The Millennium
Alliance for Humanity and the Biosphere. Available at: https://mahb.stanford.edu/library-item/fossil-fuels-run/.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.