INFLUENCER MARKETPLACE: SIGNALS BEHIND THE SALE

Imagine a classic economic model – a marketplace where buyers and sellers interact. Ideally, everyone has perfect information: buyers know exactly what they're getting, and sellers know the true value of their product. This is a world of symmetric information.

But the reality of social media is far from ideal. Consumers face asymmetric information. You see a famous influencer endorsing a product, but you don't know the product's true effectiveness or if the endorsement is genuine. Here's where influencers act as signallers.                                                                 

Image: Lemme From Instagram                                               

                                                                                                                        

---

 

Signalling Theory: Decoding the Endorsement Game

In the realm of social media, influencers wield considerable influence, strategically utilising their platforms to convey nuanced messages. Signalling theory (Spence, 1973) offers insight into this phenomenon, explaining how individuals or firms strategically communicate information through endorsements. Within the domain of influencer marketing, these signals play a pivotal role in shaping consumers' perceptions of products.

Imagine scrolling through your Instagram feed: a prominent fitness influencer enthusiastically promotes a new workout program. Intrigued, you assume the program's merits align with the influencer's endorsement. However, herein lies the challenge: these signals can be either informative or manipulative.

Informative signals genuinely reflect the quality of a product, rooted in the influencer's authentic endorsement. Conversely, manipulative signals prioritise personal gain, often obscuring the true nature of the product. Consider the example of a celebrity endorsing a disastrous music festival as a luxurious escape, epitomised by Kendall Jenner's involvement in the ill-fated Fyre Festival (Akerlof, 1970).

---

Would You Have Been Fooled? Examining The Fyre Festival Debacle

The Fyre Festival disaster became a textbook case of economic mayhem. Influencers like Kendall Jenner unwittingly became pawns in a deceptive marketing campaign, showcasing a fabricated paradise. This created asymmetric information (Stiglitz, 2001) - attendees, lured by the glamorous facade, lacked crucial details about the festival's true state. This highlights adverse selection (Akerlof, 1970). Unable to deliver luxury, Fyre relied on influencer marketing to attract attendees with glitz, not substance.

The festival became a cautionary tale: distorted information, manipulated signals, and a focus on marketing over quality led to economic downfall. In the age of influencer culture, appearances can be deceiving, and the consequences for both consumers and businesses can be dire.

---

 

Adverse Selection and the Influencer Economy

In the world of social media, where every like, share, and comment holds power, there lurks another concept straight out of economics textbooks: adverse selection. But what exactly is adverse selection, and how does it weave its way into the concept of the influencer economy?

• Because adverse selection creates asymmetric information between buyers and sellers in the market, which will lead to inefficiency, often manifesting as either a shortage or a surplus. The graph shows a market shortage as a result of adverse selection, where consumers demand more product than the producer can supply.

Think of it like this: you’re eyeing a brand-new tech product promoted by your favourite influencer. They’re raving about it, saying it’s the best thing since sliced bread. But here’s the catch: they might not be telling you the whole story. This is where adverse selection kicks in. Maybe they are selectively sharing only the most glamorous aspects of the products without disclosing potential drawbacks. This information asymmetry can leave consumers like you high and dry, stuck with a product that fails to deliver on its promises.

Social media platforms like Instagram and TikTok have created a whole new marketplace where influencers reign supreme. These ‘internet celebs’ have built up massive followings, and their word carries serious weight. Some genuinely love the products they promote, while others are just in it for the paycheck. So, next time you're scrolling through your feed and a sponsored post catches your eye, remember to take it with a grain of salt. Adverse selection is like a silent predator, lurking in the shadows of every influencer's post, and it can lead to an unequal distribution of quality goods or services. It’s up to you to separate the signals from the hype. 

---

 Being a savvy consumer

It is pivotal to question the authenticity and relevance of the influencers consumers follow. Behind the attractive profile pictures and scripted videos, consumers face an obstacle to understanding the real quality and idea of the product.

Smart consumers should practise independent research instead of taking influencers’ words as the basis for their choices and decisions. The first step is to check reviews from other sources that lack bias. Moreover, consumers can use sources including direct customer feedback to prevent being prey to clever and scripted marketing. Sources that eliminate the bias of sponsorship and partnership are also useful tools to analyse the product and check its eligibility.

---

The Future of Influence: Building Trust and Transparency

Despite challenges, influencers can be valuable information sources if they prioritise trust and transparency. When they connect genuinely with their audience and promote products they believe in, they help create an efficient market for informed consumer decisions.

For example, dermatologists TikTokers leverage their expertise to address skin concerns, gaining trust by offering evidence-based advice and insights rather than promoting passing trends. Followers then trust the information and products recommended. To create a more sustainable influencer economy, it is crucial for influencers across all industries to prioritise transparency, disclose their partnerships, and maintain a commitment to their audience's best interests.

Signalling theory reminds us to be critical consumers. By understanding the economic forces at play, we can make informed decisions based on real value, not just the latest filtered trend. The next time you see an influencer endorsement, remember, it's just one signal in a complex economic marketplace. Analyse it critically, and you'll be a smarter player in the game.

 

---

ARE YOU INFLUENCED BY INFLUENCERS? 

Let your voice be heard! Answer the following questions from the link below and share your thoughts on influencer marketing - LINK TO QUESTIONNAIRE

References:

Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.

Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signalling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2001). Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics. American Economic Review, 92(3), 460–501.