“TOURIST GO HOME!”
This slogan can be widely seen on walls across cities such as Barcelona and New York (World Habitat, 2025). Behind it lies a growing frustration: while Airbnb easily provides cheaper stays and a more ‘local’ experience to foreign travellers, this comfort may push locals out of their own neighbourhood. So the question is no longer whether Airbnb is convenient – but who is paying for that convenience?(Peter, 2017)
Why are tourists choosing Airbnb?
To understand the reason behind
this phenomenon, we must start with a simple idea: preferences.
Nowadays, more and more
travellers are moving away from traditional hotels in favour of experiencing
local life. This allows them to immerse themselves in the neighbourhood,
explore local cafes, and even cook at home. Airbnb, with a wide range of
options, provides flexibility in letting people choose their “dreamed local
home", like the number of bedrooms,
whether to have a kitchen or laundry facilities, and family-friendly
equipment (Gibbs et al., 2018). More importantly, a friendly, more affordable
price attracts many tourists who have few high-end travel options. This shift
in consumer preferences is pushing travellers away from chains like Marriott or
Hilton to local rentals. In Texas, each additional 10% increase in the size of
the Airbnb market resulted in a 39% decrease in hotel room revenue (Zervas et
al., 2017).
From a microeconomic
perspective, these evolving preferences increase demand in the short-term
rental market and drive up its profitability. Profit-seeking hosts will
therefore change their properties from long-term tenants to Airbnb listings.
From a report by Aline Cruvinel and Murray Cox (2026), in 92% of active
countries, entire-home listings account for 82.4% of all listings, representing
approximately 6.88 million housing units potentially removed from long-term
residential use. This reallocation will reduce the supply of long-term leasing
and contribute to a rising rent at a balance point in the market. Consequently,
a traveller's seemingly simple decision can significantly impact the local
housing market, affecting the availability of properties and the overall market
conditions.
(Palomera,
2025)
No one pays for the hidden costs
However, the story doesn't end
with changes in supply and demand.
The rise of Airbnb also brings a
range of knock-on effects, the kind that don’t show up in prices but are still
very real. Economists call these 'externalities', but in everyday terms, it
just means that the choices of hosts and travellers end up affecting others
without being reflected in the price.
A good place to see this is in
the housing market. As more property owners realise they can earn higher
returns through short-term rentals, many start moving away from long-term
leasing, which leads to fewer homes available for the locals. With supply tightening,
leasing fees begin to rise, and the trend is putting extra pressure on local
tenants (Barron et al., 2021). Moreover, in many neighbourhoods, especially
quiet residential ones, a steady flow of short-term guests can change the feel
of the area. There may be more noise, more congestion, and less of a sense of
community over time (Guttentag, 2015). These effects are challenging to
measure, but they’re very real for the people who live there. While hosts and
tourists benefit, locals may end up bearing the cost, both financially and
otherwise.
Figure 1
That said, it wouldn’t be fair to paint Airbnb as
entirely negative. There are upsides too. Visitors staying in local
neighbourhoods often spend money at nearby cafés, restaurants, and small
businesses, which boosts the local economy (Fang et al., 2016). These benefits
ripple out beyond the host and guest, supporting communities in ways that
aren’t directly reflected in rental prices. This is what economists would call
a 'positive externality', where the wider benefits to society (marginal social
benefit, MSB) are greater than the benefits captured by individuals (marginal
private benefit, MPB).
All things considered, Airbnb is an excellent
illustration of how real-world marketplaces are rarely flawless. Individual
decisions may make sense on their own, but when you look more broadly, the
final result may not necessarily be in everyone's best interests.
When the market becomes uncontrollable, and a large number
of housing properties shift from long-term to short-term rentals, the
governments may step in to correct it. The objective of these policies is to
reduce the hidden costs Airbnb makes without eliminating the benefits that the
platform brings.
One effective policy is to impose a tax, such as a Pigouvian
tax, on short-term rentals. This will shift external costs onto hosts and
Airbnb users by increasing their costs (a process known as
"internalisation" in economics), which will force some hosts to exit
and enter the long-term leasing market to increase supply. Alternatively,
governments can set annual caps on how many days a home can be rented out. The
short-term rental activity is directly reduced by such quantity limits, which
also contribute to an increase in the supply of long-term housing.
(Alegre, 2024)
The growth of
Airbnb has revealed a clear conflict between private incentives and desirable
social outcomes.
While it
improves efficiency by matching supply to consumer demand, it simultaneously
generates negative consequences by reducing long-term housing availability and
snowballing rent prices. This highlights the case of market failure, where
individually rational decisions lead to socially suboptimal outcomes.
Policy
interventions, such as taxes or price limits, may help correct these
distortions by internalising external costs, but they involve inevitable
trade-offs for hosts and tourists. The key question, therefore, is not whether
Airbnb is beneficial, but for whom and at what cost.
- Alegre,
J. (2024). Barcelona Mayor Wants to Fix Housing Crisis by Banning
Short-Term Tourist Rentals | The Deep Dive. [online] The Deep Dive.
Available at: https://thedeepdive.ca/barcelona-mayor-wants-to-fix-housing-crisis-by-banning-short-term-tourist-rentals/
[Accessed 12 Apr. 2026].
- Barron,
K., Kung, E. and Proserpio, D. (2021) ‘The effect of home-sharing on house
prices and rents: Evidence from Airbnb’, Marketing Science, 40(1),
pp. 23–47.
- Guttentag,
D. (2015) ‘Airbnb: Disruptive innovation and the rise of an informal
tourism accommodation sector’, Current Issues in Tourism, 18(12),
pp. 1192–1217.
- Fang, B.,
Ye, Q. and Law, R. (2016) ‘Effect of sharing economy on tourism industry
employment’, Annals of Tourism Research, 57, pp. 264–267.
- Gibbs,
C., Guttentag, D., Gretzel, U., Morton, J., & Goodwill, A. (2018).
Pricing in the sharing economy: a hedonic pricing model applied to Airbnb
listings. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 35(1), 46–56.
- Palomera,
J. (2025). Barcelona and Madrid have very different ideas on tackling
Spain’s housing crisis. Which will succeed? [online] The Guardian.
Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/dec/22/barcelona-madrid-different-ideas-tackling-spain-housing-crisis
(Accessed 12 Apr. 2026).
- Peter,
L. (2017). ‘Tourists go home’: Leftists resist Spain’s influx. BBC News.
[online] 5 Aug. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-40826257
(Accessed 12 Apr. 2026).
- World
Habitat (2025). The Airbnb Effect: short-term rentals with long-term
consequences. Available at: https://world-habitat.org/blog/airbnb-and-the-housing-crisis/
(Accessed: 12 Apr. 2026).
- Zervas,
G., Proserpio, D. and Byers, J.W. (2017) ‘The rise of the sharing economy:
Estimating the impact of Airbnb on the hotel industry’, Management
Science, 63(4), pp. 1147–1162. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2380.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.