Have you ever opened a bag of chips and thought, “Didn’t this used to be… fuller? Why does the bag look half empty?”
Literally.
The price? Unchanged. But the bag looks like it contains more air than chips.
The chocolate bar looks shorter. The ice cream tub looks suspiciously “frosty”
at the top. And no, you aren’t being paranoid. It’s called shrinkflation, and
it's changing how markets work without you even noticing. Yet, why do consumers
still purchase from the same brands? This is where market signalling comes into
play.
How Market Signalling Masks Shrinkflation
In
a perfect world, we’d always get what we pay for. But businesses use tactics
like shrinkflation to make us think we're getting the same value when we’re
not. Instead of raising prices outright, companies reduce the quantity or size,
like that bag of chips that seems to keep having more air than snacks, hoping
consumers won’t notice (Wolfe, 2021). The key to pulling this off? Market
signalling: the strategic way businesses convey product value to their
consumers (Spence, 1973).
This
works because of asymmetric information. Consumers often lack full knowledge of
product changes, allowing firms to use market signalling to maintain perceived
value (Akerlof, 1970). Instead of openly raising prices,
companies use signals like unchanged packaging or “NEW & IMPROVED” labels
to make you think you’re still getting the same value. These signals shape
consumer perception, often disguising the reality that you’re paying more for
less.
The Psychology Behind Market Signalling
Market
signalling isn’t just about packaging, it’s about influencing behaviour. Think
about university degrees. Why do people try so hard to get one? Their value
isn’t just in the education itself but in the signals, they send to employers
about skills and dedication (Spence, 1973) and because it looks good on our
CVs. Similarly, when a brand invests in high-end packaging, it’s not just for
the aesthetics. It signals quality and reliability, even when the actual product
has changed (Gabaix and Laibson, 2006).
When
shrinkflation occurs, businesses take advantage of it. They deceive customers
into remaining loyal by signalling stability and consistency through
recognisable branding and packaging while discreetly shrinking the product's
size (Wolfe, 2021).
The Silent Price Hike: Why Products Shrink
Inflation raises prices over time,
and while consumers dislike price hikes, they’re visible. You see it when your
favourite café suddenly starts charging £4.50 for a flat white. Shrinkflation,
however, operates differently. It’s inflation’s quieter cousin, where costs
creep up unnoticed, meaning you get less for the same amount of money (Baker et
al., 2019).
Why do companies choose this route?
It all comes down to us: the consumers. Research shows that two-thirds of UK
shoppers prioritise price over size when making purchasing decisions
(Insitetrack, 2025). Companies know that raising prices outright may drive
shoppers away. Instead, they shrink products by a few grams, using market
signalling to maintain a sense of normalcy (Chevalier and Gertner, 2007).
Most shoppers don’t closely check
the product's weight or volume, they buy out of habit rather than reasoning
since they assume consistency based on branding. Economists call this
signal of stability (Gabaix & Laibson, 2006), now you can casually drop
that into conversations to impress (or annoy) your friends.
Shrinkflation in Action: From Chocolate Bars to Toilet
Paper
Take Toblerone’s infamous 2016 redesign: The chocolate brand increased
the gaps between its iconic peaks, reducing the bar’s weight by 25% while
keeping the packaging nearly identical (BBC News, 2023). Consumers noticed, and
the backlash was instantaneous, highlighting the balance companies must
maintain; if the signal is weak or consumers catch on, the strategy backfires.
But how does this affect you? Does
it really matter if brands shave off a few grams? It does. Adding it all up,
shrinkflation is a hidden way of draining your wallet because it’s everywhere:
from toilet paper to ready meals. Tesco, for instance, cut 50 grams from some
ready meals without lowering prices (The Grocer, 2023). A study found that when
shrinkflation is factored in, the true price increase of products like paper
goods was around 35% higher than it appeared (Schoen, 2024). That’s not a small
change, especially for households already struggling with grocery bills. So
next time you shop, take a closer look, you might be paying more for less!
Can Market Signalling Be Used for Good?
Not all market signalling is
deceptive. Some companies use it to build trust. Carrefour, a French
supermarket chain, labels products affected by shrinkflation, warning customers
when sizes shrink but prices don’t (BBC News, 2024). This kind of transparency
strengthens consumer trust and pressures competitors to follow suit.
Some brands even highlight that
their products remain the same size despite rising costs, signalling their
commitment to fair value (Stiglitz, 2001). When used honestly, market
signalling helps consumers make informed choices rather than misleading them.
How to Stop Shrinkflation Tricks
Want to beat shrinkflation at its
own game? Here’s how:
1.
Check the price per unit:
Look at the cost per 100g or item on supermarket labels to spot hidden price
hikes.
2.
Use social media:
Platforms like TikTok and Reddit are full of consumers exposing shrinkflation
tricks (Business Insider, 2024).
3.
Support transparent brands:
Reward companies that are upfront about changes or maintain consistent product
sizes.
4.
Pay attention to product design
changes: A new “sleek” bottle or a “modernised” container
might just mean less product inside.
Final Thoughts: Read Between the Lines
Market signalling isn’t inherently
bad, it’s just how companies communicate value. But when used to mask
shrinkflation, it shifts power away from consumers. Next time, don’t just look
at the price, look at what the product is actually telling you. Are they being honest, or quietly making you
pay more for less? The signals are there, you just have to know how to read
them!
Why
not learn more? Educaplay (2023) provides an interactive quiz to explore
shrinkflation’s effects click here or try our own
questionnaire here!
Bibliography
Akerlof,
G.A., 1970. The market for ‘lemons’: Quality uncertainty and the market
mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), pp.488–500.
Baker,
W.E., et al., 2019. Consumer behaviour and shrinkflation: A strategic overview.
Journal of Marketing Research, 56(5), pp.702–719.
BBC
News, 2023. Toblerone reverts to original shape after backlash. BBC News.
Available at: https://www.bbc.com [Accessed 10 March 2025].
BBC
News, 2024. Carrefour labels shrinkflation products to warn customers. BBC
News. Available at: https://www.bbc.com [Accessed 10 March 2025].
Business
Insider, 2024. Social media exposes shrinkflation in food products. Business
Insider. Available at: https://www.businessinsider.com [Accessed 17 March
2025].
Chevalier,
J.A. and Gertner, R., 2007. Market signalling and the pricing of goods. Journal
of Consumer Research, 34(2), pp.197–209.
Educaplay,
2023. Shrinkflation may leave fewer. Educaplay. Available at:
https://www.educaplay.com/learning-resources/11961032-shrinkflation_may_leave_fewer.html
[Accessed 26 March 2025].
Gabaix,
X. and Laibson, D., 2006. Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information
suppression in competitive markets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,
121(2), pp.505–540.
Graham,
R., 2020. Shrinkflation: A review of its impact on consumer behaviour. Marketing
Insights Quarterly, 17(3), pp.45–60.
Insitetrack,
2025. Consumer behaviour and price sensitivity report. Insitetrack.
Available at: https://www.insitetrack.com [Accessed 13 March 2025].
Schoen,
J., 2024. The sneaky economics of shrinkflation: Less product, same price. The
New York Times, 1 March. Available at:
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/01/business/economy/shrinkflation-groceries.html
[Accessed 13 March 2025].
Stiglitz,
J.E., 2001. Information and the change in the paradigm in economics. American
Economic Review, 92(3), pp.460–501.
Wolfe,
D., 2021. Inflation, shrinkflation, and consumer perception. Journal of
Economic Behavior & Organization, 93, pp.34–56.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.