[Average
ocean temperatures were much warmer (Image: Asaad Niiazi/AFP) / Wildfires
scorched Greece (Pic: Harvey
Pocklington/PA)] |
In July 2023, Europe recorded its hottest day ever (Welle, 2023). Roads
buckled in Rome, wildfires scorched Greece (British Red Cross, 2023), and heat
alerts swept from Madrid to Paris. The link between carbon emissions and these
extreme high-temperature climate change events is undeniable (NASA, 2024).
Burning fossil fuels like coal and oil releases carbon dioxide, a greenhouse
gas that traps heat in the atmosphere. This results in rising global
temperatures, more frequent floods, severe droughts, and escalating food
shortages. As the earth grows hotter, we must ask: why is this happening?
[Historical trend of global annual
temperature rise relative to pre-industrial period / Fuel industry creates a huge
amount of carbon emissions] |
The True Cost of Climate Change
This alarming surge trend in temperatures did not start in 2023; the global
mean temperature has been rising since the Second Industrial Revolution.
Ironically, those who contribute the least to emissions—the poorest and most
vulnerable—are often the ones who suffer the most. Meanwhile, fossil fuel
companies, the major contributors, rarely bear the costs of the damage they
cause.
This brings us to an economic reality: climate change is not just an
environmental issue but also an economic problem. It exemplifies a negative
externality (a kind of market failure)—where
the cost imposed on society is not reflected in the price of fossil fuels. As a
result, the market fails to allocate resources efficiently. When the damage
from carbon emissions is ignored, we cannot rely on market mechanisms to
resolve the issue. The real problem lies in the fact that polluters don’t pay,
while everyone else suffers.
Why Doesn’t the Market Fix Itself?
Usually, the market's invisible hand works to allocate resources efficiently,
just as the ocean self-purifies. But why doesn’t the market fix this imbalance?
Climate change is often called the biggest market failure in history because
several economic barriers hinder market-based solutions. Firstly, the
atmosphere is a shared resource—no single entity owns it, making it difficult
to assign responsibility for pollution. Secondly, the free-rider problem arises
because climate action benefits everyone, leading some countries to delay
taking steps, hoping others will act instead. Lastly, many individuals and
businesses lack awareness of how their actions, like using fossil fuel-driven
vehicles, contribute to climate change. The focus on short-term gains over
long-term sustainability further complicates the issue.
What can we do to help the market fix it?
Economists advocate for cost
internalization, where polluters pay the full environmental costs of their
actions. Carbon taxes, cap-and-trade systems, and green subsidies are examples
of policies designed to make fossil fuel consumption reflect its true cost.
Sweden’s carbon tax has proven effective in reducing emissions while
maintaining economic stability (Sun et al., 2022). Similarly, Norway’s green
subsidies for electric vehicles have significantly boosted the transition to
clean energy (IEA, 2023). The country has implemented incentive measures such
as reducing road taxes and tolls, providing free charging stations, and
offering dedicated roads for electric vehicles, leading to a surge in EV sales.
In addition, the EU Emissions Trading
System (EU ETS) allows companies to obtain trading permits and establish
emission reduction incentive mechanisms. Companies that do not exceed emission
standards can sell their remaining quotas in the market, while those that
exceed standards are required to purchase additional quotas. According to the
European Environment Agency, this trading system has achieved a 47% reduction
in emissions between 2005 and 2023 (Appunn and Wettengel, 2024). These policies
can help reduce the negative externalities caused by pollution to some extent.
Reference list Appunn, K. and Wettengel, J. (2024). Understanding
the European Union’s Emissions Trading System. [online] Clean Energy Wire. Available
at:
https://www.cleanenergywire.org/factsheets/understanding-european-unions-emissions-trading-system. Arain, Z.A. (2020). The biggest emitters could be held
to account by accountants. [online] World Economic Forum. Available at:
https://www.weforum.org/stories/2020/01/accountants-can-hold-fossil-fuel-companies-to-account-heres-how/. British Red Cross (2023). Europe
heatwave 2023: extreme heat spirals into wildfires. [online] British Red
Cross. Available at:
https://www.redcross.org.uk/stories/disasters-and-emergencies/world/europe-heatwave-2023. IEA (2023). Norway’s electric
vehicle incentives – Policies. [online] IEA. Available at:
https://www.iea.org/policies/17809-norways-electric-vehicle-incentives. Kulkarni, C. and DHNS (2022). Fossil
fuel subsidies in India nine times higher than renewable energy: Study.
[online] Deccan Herald. Available at:
https://www.deccanherald.com/india/fossil-fuel-subsidies-in-india-nine-times-higher-than-renewable-energy-study-1114164.html. NASA (2024). Evidence. [online] science.nasa.gov.
Available at: https://science.nasa.gov/climate-change/evidence/. Pullins, T. and Knijnenburg, S. (2025). US Withdrawal
from the Paris Agreement: Impact and Next Steps | White & Case LLP.
[online] Whitecase.com. Available at:
https://www.whitecase.com/insight-alert/us-withdrawal-paris-agreement-impact-and-next-steps. Sun, Y., Zhang, X., Ding, Y., Chen,
D., Qin, D., & Zhai, P. (2022). Understanding human influence on climate
change in China. National Science Review, 9(3),
nwab113. Volunteer fdip (2022). Top 10
Environmental Celebrity Activists Inspiring the World to Volunteer with Climate
Action to Stop Climate Change. [online] www.volunteerfdip.org. Available
at:
https://www.volunteerfdip.org/environmental-celebrity-activists-inspiring-the-world-to-volunteer-with-climate-action-to-stop-climate-change. Welle, D. (2023). July 2023 was the
hottest month ever recorded, EU confirms. [online] dw.com. Available at:
https://www.dw.com/en/july-2023-was-the-hottest-month-ever-recorded-eu-confirms/a-66467143.
Yang, L., Liao, W., Liu, C., Zhang, N., Zhong, S., & Huang, C. (2018).
Associations between knowledge of the causes and perceived impacts of climate
change: a cross-sectional survey of medical, public health and nursing students
in universities in China. International journal of environmental
research and public health, 15(12), 2650. [Policy
decisions may affect global greenhouse gas emissions scenarios] |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.